Skip to content

Conversation

@krakow10
Copy link
Contributor

@krakow10 krakow10 commented May 3, 2025

The first commit is easier to read than the formatting one. This is better because btree_map::Entry stores an open "Bucket" so the .insert operation does not have to search for an open entry again. Potentially gains 10% on "100 100-line ModuleScripts/Serialize" benchmark (unreliable?) but not much else changes.

@Dekkonot
Copy link
Member

Dekkonot commented May 4, 2025

This doesn't seem to improve performance at all on my system, but I also had to make patches to it to make it actually run. Is this the code you're testing?

@krakow10
Copy link
Contributor Author

krakow10 commented May 4, 2025

Ah, I built the two pairs of commits separately, but never together. The first commit showed the higher throughput, but the second two didn't seem to have an impact. I ran another benchmark for this and got the weird 70% result so I posted it to #529 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants