Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .Rprofile
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ if (file.exists('~/.Rprofile')) {
options(blogdown.new_bundle = TRUE)
options(blogdown.subdir = "blog")
options(blogdown.title_case = TRUE)
options(blogdown.hugo.version = "0.133.0")
options(blogdown.hugo.version = "0.146.7")
options(blogdown.knit.on_save = FALSE)
options(blogdown.method = "markdown")
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions .gitignore
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,3 +28,5 @@ resources/_gen
/layouts/shortcodes/blogdown
/.quarto/
translations.R

**/*.quarto_ipynb
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions content/author/aymeric-stamm/_index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
---
name: Aymeric Stamm
bio: Research engineer in Statistics at CNRS. Specialized in developing novel statistical methods for analyzing complex data, such as manifold-valued data, network-valued data, topological data, connectome data and so on. Applications in neuroscience and gait analysis. Actively contributing to the open-source community to foster a collaborative science globewise. Technical support team member of Computo journal.
link: https://astamm.github.io
github: astamm
orcid: 0000-0002-8725-3654
linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aymeric-stamm-65a420179/
img: img/community/aymeric-stamm.jpg
---
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions content/author/françois-david-collin/_index.md
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You'll need to use françois-david-collin as the folder name to ensure this works correctly (i.e. keep special characters)

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
---
name: François-David Collin
bio: Research engineer in LLMs, statistics and machine learning at CNRS, Alexander Grotendieck Montpellier Institute (IMAG), Montpellier University, France. Technical support team member of Computo journal. Part-time lecturer at MIASHS, Paul Valery University.
link: https://fradav.perso.math.cnrs.fr
twitter: LuinGor
github: fradav
orcid: 0000-0002-8374-7163
linkedin: fradav
---
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions content/author/julien-chiquet/_index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
---
name: Julien Chiquet
bio: Senior Researcher in Statistics and Machine Learning. EiC of Computo.
link: https://jchiquet.github.io/
github: jchiquet
orcid: 0000-0002-3629-3429
linkedin: jchiquet
img: img/community/julien-chiquet.jpg
---
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions content/author/marie-pierre-etienne/_index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
---
name: Marie-Pierre Etienne
bio: Interested in Statistical ecology and statistics for stochastic processes.
link: https://marieetienne.github.io/
github: MarieEtienne
orcid: 0000-0002-2097-2267
linkedin: marie-pierre-etienne
img: img/community/marie-pierre-etienne.jpg
---
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions content/author/nelle-varoquaux/_index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
---
name: Nelle Varoquaux
bio: Researcher in machine learning and causal inference methods to better understand structure, function, regulation, and evolution of genomes.
link: https://nellev.github.io/
github: nellev
orcid: 0000-0002-8748-6546
---
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions content/author/pierre-neuvial/_index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
---
name: Pierre Neuvial
bio: Statistician specialized in High-Dimensional Statistics and Multiple Testing.
link: https://www.math.univ-toulouse.fr/~pneuvial/
github: pneuvial
orcid: 0000-0003-3584-9998
linkedin: pierre-neuvial-50027316
img: img/community/pierre-neuvial.jpg
---
92 changes: 92 additions & 0 deletions content/blog/2025-10-20-computo/index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
---
title: Computo - A Journal for Transparent and Reproducible Research in Statistics and Machine Learning
author:
- Julien Chiquet
- François-David Collin
- Marie-Pierre Etienne
- Aymeric Stamm
- Nelle Varoquaux
slug: computo-journal-reproducible-research-statistics-machine-learning
date: '2025-11-06'
tags:
- software-peer-review
- reproducible research
- open science
- statistics
- machine learning
- R
- community
description: "[Computo](https://computo-journal.org) is a journal promoting methodological, computational, and algorithmic contributions in statistics and machine learning that provide a better understanding of which models or methods are most appropriate to answer specific scientific questions. Computo leverages modern tools in programming and scientific reporting to support more transparent, interactive, and reproducible research outputs."
socialImg: https://computo-journal.org/assets/img/logo_text_vertical.svg
socialAlt: Computo logo
editor: Steffi LaZerte
params:
doi: "10.59350/6pnct-5cj35"
---

{{< imgtxt src="https://computo-journal.org/assets/img/logo_text_vertical.svg" alt="Computo logo" link="https://computo-journal.org/site/about.html" >}}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This link isn't working at the moment, but I've opened an issue (#1181) as I think it's a website issue.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the browser, it works fine. I would not know how to help debug this further.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh glad to hear it works for you, perhaps it's a browser-related thing. At any rate Maëlle pushed a fix (it wasn't your problem 😁) so we're hopefully good to go!

[Computo](https://computo-journal.org) is a journal promoting methodological, computational, and algorithmic contributions in statistics and machine learning that provide a better understanding of which models or methods are most appropriate to answer specific scientific questions. Computo leverages modern tools in programming and scientific reporting to support more transparent, interactive, and reproducible research outputs.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps add something explicitly explaining why an article about Computo is on the rOpenSci blog? e.g., add a sentence at the end like "We're excited to introduce Computo to the rOpenSci community as a complementary...."

{{</ imgtxt >}}

## Why we created Computo

The idea of Computo was born out of a need to address several challenges in the current scientific publishing landscape, particularly within statistics and machine learning. While the reproducibility crisis is a significant concern, with an increasing volume of publications straining the review process and potentially impacting quality \[1\], Computo also aims to foster a deeper scientific understanding.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a bit unclear about which challenges Computo aims to address. The reproducivility crisis? The strain fo the increasing volume of publications on the review process? What do you think of the following suggestion?

Suggested change
The idea of Computo was born out of a need to address several challenges in the current scientific publishing landscape, particularly within statistics and machine learning. While the reproducibility crisis is a significant concern, with an increasing volume of publications straining the review process and potentially impacting quality \[1\], Computo also aims to foster a deeper scientific understanding.
The idea of Computo was born out of a desire to foster a deeper scientific understanding as well as a need to address several challenges in the current scientific publishing landscape, especially within statistics and machine learning. In particular the reproducibility crisis is a significant concern, and the increasing volume of publications straining the review process is potentially impacting quality of scientific publications[^1].

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will check with the editorial board today and get back to you on this later in the day.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
The idea of Computo was born out of a need to address several challenges in the current scientific publishing landscape, particularly within statistics and machine learning. While the reproducibility crisis is a significant concern, with an increasing volume of publications straining the review process and potentially impacting quality \[1\], Computo also aims to foster a deeper scientific understanding.
The idea of Computo was born out of a need to address several challenges in the current scientific publishing landscape, particularly within statistics and machine learning. While the reproducibility crisis is a significant concern, with an increasing volume of publications straining the review process and potentially impacting quality [^1], Computo also aims to foster a deeper scientific understanding.


The rapid proliferation of new methods in machine learning and statistics can make it difficult to establish a clear state of the art for specific scientific questions. There is often a lack of established, subject-specific benchmark datasets, and the pressure to demonstrate the superiority of novel methods can sometimes lead to less-than-objective performance evaluations. Furthermore, publishing negative results (e.g. failure to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement), which are crucial for scientific progress, remains challenging.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like there's something missing in "A clear state of the art [---] for specific scientific questions.".
A clear state of the art what? "Procedure"? "Roadmap"? "Method"?


Computo was created to promote methodological and algorithmic contributions that not only are reproducible but also provide a better understanding of which models or methods are most appropriate to answer specific scientific questions. We believe that building up solid scientific knowledge requires both the reproducibility of published results and a clear articulation of their scientific implications. While many journals now require code and data, these are often insufficient on their own to ensure true reproducibility or to fully grasp the scientific contribution.

[^1]: Hanson, M. A., Barreiro, P. G., Crosetto, P., & Brockington, D. (2024). The strain on scientific publishing. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(4), 823-843.

## What Computo offers

Computo differs from other existing journals both in its scope and in the centrality given to reproducibility and open science.

### Scope

Computo welcomes a range of contributions in statistics and machine learning:

- New methods with original stats/ML developments, or numerical studies that illustrate theoretical results in stats/ML;

- Case studies or surveys on stats/ML methods to address a specific (type of) question in data analysis, neutral comparison studies that provide insight into when, how, and why the compared methods perform well or less well;

- Software/tutorial papers to present implementations of stats/ML algorithms or to feature the use of a package/toolbox. For such papers we expect not only the description of an existing implementation but also the study of a concrete use case. If applicable, a comparison to related works and appropriate benchmarking are also expected.

### Reproducibility and open science

By combining open access, reproducibility, and methodological clarity, Computo aims to support the scientific community in making informed and transparent choices in data analysis:

- Computo is an online-only journal, under the [diamond open access](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond_open_access "diamond open access") publication model, free for authors and readers;

- Computo systematically makes all exchanges between authors and reviewers available: reviews are often very useful to readers, and making them available is also a recognition of the important work done by reviewers. To address the fear of some prospective authors that an overly negative review could undermine the chances of later publication, we have chosen to make the reviews available upon publication. Moreover, the reviewers may choose to remain anonymous, as some reviewers do not feel comfortable lifting their anonymity.&#x20;

- Computo uses an original publication format that guarantees the reproducibility of results: articles are submitted as notebooks integrating text, code, equations and bibliographic references. Thanks to [Quarto](https://quarto.org/), we are able to support R, Python and Julia. A submission is associated with a git repository (hosted on [GitHub](https://github.com)) configured to demonstrate, dynamically and durably, the reproducibility of the contribution. HTML and PDF versions of the article are automatically built through GitHub Actions. Templates to prepare a new submission are available from the [Computo submission page](https://computo-journal.org/site/guidelines-authors.html "Computo submission page").

### Where we are at

Since its inception in late 2022, we have created a robust ecosystem for reproducible science. As of July 2025, we have published 17 articles, and 4 are under review. An example of published paper is given below:

{{< quote footer="Giorgi et al." cite="[Efficient simulation of individual-based population models, **Computo**, 2024.](https://computo-journal.org/published-202412-giorgi-efficient/)" >}}
{{< figure src="https://codimd.math.cnrs.fr/uploads/upload_3627015bebde47d40c656be41d76c014.png" alt="Efficient simulation of individual-based population models" >}}
{{< /quote >}}

### Collaboration and challenges

We use [GitHub to host our repositories](https://github.com/computorg) and Quarto for document creation, ensuring that all code and data are openly available (contributions for GitLab support are welcome!). This collaborative approach has allowed us to overcome numerous challenges, from technical hurdles to ensuring the quality and reproducibility of published work.

One significant challenge has been refining our peer-review process to balance rigor with accessibility. We\'ve explored various platforms and are currently considering a future move towards a more community-driven and transparent system to enhance engagement.

A more fundamental challenge lies in defining and evaluating the true reproducibility of scientific work. We distinguish between "editorial reproducibility" – the ability to re-run the provided code and obtain the same outputs – and "scientific reproducibility," which delves deeper into the robustness and generalizability of the findings. Establishing clear guidelines and policies for this, especially in complex fields like Deep Learning, has been a continuous effort. For instance, evaluating a Deep Learning paper where retraining a model might be infeasible or beyond the scope of the submitted work requires careful consideration of what constitutes a "reproducible" contribution from a scientific standpoint, beyond just code execution.

## The future of Computo

With a shared focus on improving the quality of scientific contributions, rOpenSci and Computo offer complementary approaches to fostering reproducible research. rOpenSci (and by extension pyOpenSci for the Python side) focuses on the reliability and robustness of software tools through a transparent, community-driven peer review process. Computo, in turn, ensures that these tools are used in transparent and fully reproducible computational scientific articles, preserving code, data, and environment specifications.

Looking ahead, we aim to further enhance the dissemination of scientific knowledge by moving towards greater interactivity, richer data visualizations, and exploring innovative communication models, drawing inspiration from initiatives like the former [distill.pub](https://distill.pub). Our approach is to progressively engage all stakeholders: editors, engineers, authors, and the wider scientific community in this evolution.

Our concrete next steps focus on:

* **Streamlining Workflows and Tools:** Consolidating our editorial process, potentially within a more community-focused environment, and expanding authoring tools with user-friendly computational environments for pre-submission.
* **Ensuring Long-Term Access and Innovation:** Deploying a robust platform for long-term reproducibility, including on-the-fly container creation and archiving, while continuing to explore and integrate novel ways to present and interact with scientific findings.

We look forward to continuing our journey with the support of our community and partners like rOpenSci.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we don't have a formal partnership, perhaps use slightly different wording (to avoid people thinking that our peer-review processes are linked, for example).

Suggested change
We look forward to continuing our journey with the support of our community and partners like rOpenSci.
We look forward to continuing our journey with the support of our community and like-minded organizations like rOpenSci.