Rename Book.sections to Book.items #2813
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This renames the "sections" list to "items". In practice, this list has contained more than just "sections" since parts were added. Also, the rest of the code consistently uses the term "items", since the values it contains are called `BookItem`s. Finally, the naming has always been a little confusing to me. This is a very disruptive change, and I'm not doing it lightly. However, since there are a number of other API changes going into 0.5, I think now is an ok time to change this.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This renames the "sections" list to "items". In practice, this list has contained more than just "sections" since parts were added. Also, the rest of the code consistently uses the term "items", since the values it contains are called
BookItems. Finally, the naming has always been a little confusing to me.This is a very disruptive change, and I'm not doing it lightly. However, since there are a number of other API changes going into 0.5, I think now is an ok time to change this.