Skip to content

expand the issue template for new lints #15336

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 6, 2025

Conversation

lolbinarycat
Copy link
Contributor

@lolbinarycat lolbinarycat commented Jul 24, 2025

When I first tried contributing to clippy,
I encountered the problem that a lot of lint suggestions overlapped with existing lints, so I would spend a bunch of time implementing something only to figure out it wasn't actually needed.

The "comparison with existing lints" field should hopefully reduce this somewhat, while not incresing the burden of
requesting a new lint too much due to not being mandatory.

changelog: none

When I first tried contributing to clippy,
I encountered the problem that a lot of lint suggestions overlapped
with existing lints, so I would spend a bunch of time implementing
something only to figure out it wasn't actually needed.

The "comparison with existing lints" field should hopefully reduce
this somewhat, while not incresing the burden of
requesting a new lint too much due to not being mandatory.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 24, 2025

r? @flip1995

rustbot has assigned @flip1995.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jul 24, 2025
Copy link
Member

@flip1995 flip1995 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a great idea! I still want to test this before merging. Only a small comment.

Co-authored-by: Philipp Krones <[email protected]>
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@flip1995 You approved the PR and the suggestion was applied. Is there anything else to be done here?

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Aug 6, 2025

Just me testing that it works as expected. I've done so now.

@flip1995 flip1995 added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 6, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 7673826 Aug 6, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Aug 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants