proposal: alternative ergonomic ref count RFC #351
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This goal propses a "friendly fork" of the existing ergonomic ref counting RFC to explore an option that doesn't involve new keywords or changes to the language surface syntax.
lqd
reviewed
Jul 18, 2025
| | Complete seamless implementation | @spastorino | Make `x` equivalent to `x.use` with optional linting | | ||
| | Standard reviews | ![Team][] [compiler] | | | ||
| | Lang-team champion | @nikomatsakis | | | ||
| | Design meetings | ![Team][] [lang] | Two meetings to evaluate both approaches | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CI fix
Suggested change
| | Design meetings | ![Team][] [lang] | Two meetings to evaluate both approaches | | |
| | Design meeting | ![Team][] [lang] | Two meetings to evaluate both approaches | |
traviscross
approved these changes
Jul 18, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This goal propses a "friendly fork" of the existing ergonomic ref counting RFC to explore an option that doesn't involve new keywords or changes to the language surface syntax.
@rust-lang/lang -- we should discuss whether this direction makes sense.
Rendered