.mailmap: fix broken line with multiple emails

[DanielEScherzer]

Split binarycat's entry into multiple lines, one for each extra email

Follow-up to #149739, CC @lolbinarycat @Kivooeo

[rustbot]

r? @jieyouxu

rustbot has assigned @jieyouxu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

• Fallback group: @Mark-Simulacrum, @jieyouxu
• @Mark-Simulacrum, @jieyouxu expanded to Mark-Simulacrum, jieyouxu
• Random selection from Mark-Simulacrum, jieyouxu

[jieyouxu]

r? lolbinarycat

[lolbinarycat]

this file is used by thanks.rust-lang.org to normalize emails, and i have commits using that email in other repositories.

so... yeah that's in there for a reason.

[DanielEScherzer]

this file is used by thanks.rust-lang.org to normalize emails, and i have commits using that email in other repositories.

so... yeah that's in there for a reason.

Okay, but it is currently broken - I discovered this while working on the thanks tool, which complains about the line
If the email is needed, I'll just split the line

[Kivooeo]

sorry but why was i pinged here?

[DanielEScherzer]

sorry but why was i pinged here?

Because you had approved the previous patch - I figured you you might want to know that the old version with multiple emails was invalid, sorry if that was wrong

[lolbinarycat]

Okay, but it is currently broken - I discovered this while working on the thanks tool, which complains about the line

can you show me the actual error/warning it prints out?

[DanielEScherzer]

Okay, but it is currently broken - I discovered this while working on the thanks tool, which complains about the line

can you show me the actual error/warning it prints out?

It says malformed mailmap on line 86: too many emails

See, e.g., the most recent automatic build at https://github.com/rust-lang/thanks/actions/runs/22787734149/job/66108074440, "Build static website" section line 164 of the output