Mention our policy on typofixes for internal docs #2536
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the PR. If you have write access, feel free to merge this PR if it does not need reviews. You can request a review using |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
r? rustc-dev-guide (just to get a +1 and be sure this is fine) |
|
what counts as internal docs |
|
I linked in the other PR some examples. |
|
a summary seems to be...
|
|
we could be more explicit and say something like...
|
|
do people consider rustc api docs internal docs |
|
You mean the |
|
would be good to be more concrete what we consider internal docs so far, I have this list
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sister PR of rust-forge#926.
Add clearer wording about our "spellchecking / typos" contributing policy to discourage spellcheck patches on internal documentation.