Add value name lookup for lambdas #176
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@samskivert Don't accept this PR yet.
What we (JStachio) are trying to do is solve the i18n problem consistently across JStachio and JMustache. jstachio/jstachio#104
JMustache can almost do the i18n DSL I'm proposing OOB but I need one feature of lookup values by name within a lambda.
This PR makes that possible.
The unit test shows an example of the syntax.
EDIT: I don't think i18n should be builtin to JMustache. This PR is just to make it possible through extension.