-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
refactor job conf and project conf #691
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @tyrone-yu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request refactors the configuration structures by expanding the ProjectConfig
with several new fields related to session logging, PSI algorithms, communication modes, batching, and time zones. Correspondingly, JobConfig
has also been updated to include some of these new options, and a clarifying comment has been added to define the relationship between JobConfig
and ProjectConfig
. The changes aim to enhance the flexibility and clarity of job and project configuration management.
Highlights
- Project Configuration Expansion: The
ProjectConfig
message inapi/broker.proto
has been extended to include new fields such asenable_session_logger_separation
,psi_type
,use_rr22_low_comm_mode
,batched
, andtime_zone
. This centralizes more job-related configuration options within the project-level settings. - Job Configuration Updates: The
JobConfig
message has been updated to includeuse_rr22_low_comm_mode
andbatched
fields, aligning it with some of the new project-level configurations. - Configuration Relationship Clarification: A new comment has been added to
api/broker.proto
explicitly stating thatJobConfig
is a subset ofProjectConfig
, improving clarity on their relationship.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request refactors ProjectConfig
and JobConfig
in api/broker.proto
to align their structures, with the stated goal of making JobConfig
a subset of ProjectConfig
. New configuration fields are also introduced.
I've pointed out a minor type inconsistency for the enable_session_logger_separation
field which goes against the subset goal.
A more significant concern is that this PR seems incomplete. The Go code that uses these configurations isn't updated to handle the new fields. For example, new fields in ProjectConfig
are not read, and new fields in JobConfig
are not propagated. This makes the new configurations non-functional. I assume the code changes to use these new configurations will be in a subsequent PR.
optional bool reveal_group_mark = 9; | ||
// reveal the number of elements in each group | ||
optional bool reveal_group_count = 10; | ||
optional bool enable_session_logger_separation = 11; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
什么场景下需要用 optional?
有的字段用了:group_by_threshold 有的没有:psi_curve_type
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
如果无法区分没配置还是配置的默认值的,就用的 optional
比如 reveal_group_count 配置为 false,和不配置,在不用 optional 的情况下无法区分,加了 optional 之后,不配置会产生一个空指针,可以区分
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
No description provided.