Skip to content

Conversation

GauntletWizard
Copy link

This is similar to #53 , providing a configuration value to ignore the PASV response rather than simply assuming it as a fallback. Either (or both) are sane approaches.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant