Introducing Decentralized IR Framework

src/config/SUMMARY.md.develop

@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
   - [Lessons Learned](./incident-management/lessons-learned.md)
   - [Playbooks](./incident-management/playbooks.md)
   - [SEAL 911 War Room Guidelines](./incident-management/seal-911-war-room-guidelines.md)
+  - [Decentralized Incident Response Framework (DeIRF)](./incident-management/decentralized-ir.md)
 - [Threat Modeling](./threat-modeling/README.md)
   - [Create and Maintain Threat Models](./threat-modeling/create-maintain-threat-models.md)
   - [Identity Mitigate Threats](./threat-modeling/identity-mitigate-threats.md)

src/incident-management/decentralized-ir.md

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+---
+tags:
+  - Security Specialist
+  - Operations & Strategy
+  - Devops
+  - SRE
+contributors:
+  - role: wrote
+    users: [relotnek]
+---
+
+# Decentralized Incident Response Framework (DeIRF)
+
+A lightweight, end-to-end scaffold for security teams that work without a single authority.  
+Use it as a menu, not a mandate.
+
+
+# 1. Guiding Principles
+
+| Principle | What it means in practice |
+|-----------|---------------------------|
+| **Zero-trust by default** | Assume every identity, device, and network path is potentially hostile. |
+| **Shared responsibility** | Any responder can start an action if quorum rules are met. |
+| **Minimum viable process** | Fewer steps, fewer blockers, faster containment. |
+| **Open tooling** | Prefer transparent, auditable, community-maintained tools. |
+| **Identity plurality** | Accept multiple forms of strong identity proof. |
+| **Evidence first** | Collect before you change anything. |
+| **Continuous learning** | Retrospective after every incident and drill. |
+
+---
+
+# 2. Roles and Identities
+
+| Role | Key duties | Identity options (at least two) |
+|------|-----------|----------------------------------|
+| **First Reporter** | Sounds the alarm and starts evidence capture. | GPG key, DID, or multisig wallet signature |
+| **Triage Lead** | Confirms severity, forms a swarm, assigns tasks. | FIDO2 passkey, GPG, signed Matrix handle |
+| **Comms Lead** | Handles community and regulator updates. | Company issued OIDC, Lens profile |
+| **Containment Lead** | Executes on chain actions or host isolation. | Multisig signer, SSH CA cert |
+| **Recorder** | Maintains the timeline in an immutable log. | GPG key, signed git commit |
+
+> **Tip**: Publish a public mapping of handles to real names and keep it in a tamper evident repo.
+
+---
+
+# 3. Preparation Checklist
+
+| Item | Why it matters | Suggested tools |
+|------|----------------|-----------------|
+| Asset inventory (code, infra, keys) | You cannot protect what you do not know. | ConfigDB + IaC scans, Sheet/CSV |
+| Log pipeline with reliable clock | Forensic accuracy and ordering. | Vector + Loki or OpenSearch, Elasticsearch, RunReveal |
+| Secure comms channels | Quick swarm with strong auth. | Matrix + E2EE, Signal groups, Wire |
+| Evidence bucket (write-once) | Keeps raw data safe. | S3 object-lock, Storj, or IPFS |
+| Automated alert rules | Detect known bad patterns. | On chain monitors, Falco, OpenZeppelin Defender, Slackbot |
+| Drill schedule | Muscle memory beats panic. | Calendar invites, gamedays, CTF |
+
+---
+
+# 4. Detection and Triage Flow
+
+1. **Alert fires or user reports an issue.**  
+2. **First Reporter** opens a ticket in the transparent issue tracker (GitHub security advisory or private GitLab issue).  
+3. **Triage Lead** checks severity matrix.  
+4. If **P1**, spin up a temporary incident channel with a predefined template.  
+5. Assign Leads and set T-minus deadlines.
+
+| Pros | Cons |
+|------|------|
+| Fast and clear ownership | Relies on people in multiple time zones being awake |
+| Public log builds trust | Attackers also watch public data if over-shared |
+
+---
+
+# 5. Containment Options
+
+| Method | When to use | Pros | Cons |
+|--------|-------------|------|------|
+| **Smart contract pause / circuit breaker** | Critical on-chain bug | Stops further damage instantly | Requires a pre-coded pause function and multisig |
+| **Multisig treasury freeze** | Key compromise or theft | No central keyholder | Coordination overhead |
+| **Host or pod quarantine** | Off-chain infra breach | Isolates without full shutdown | Needs orchestration rights |
+| **DNS or CDN reroute** | Phishing or DDoS | Quick traffic shift | May break some services |
+
+Keep a one-liner command ready for each action and store it in the runbook.
+
+---
+
+# 6. Eradication and Recovery
+
+1. Patch or replace vulnerable code.  
+2. Peer review with at least two signers.  
+3. Deploy to staging with replay of attack scenario.  
+4. Roll forward to production by multisig or automated pipeline.  
+5. Verify by monitoring metrics and logs for stability.
+
+| Automation hint | Keep it simple |
+|-----------------|----------------|
+| GitHub Actions, ArgoCD, and Defender Autotasks are popular. | Always include a manual approval gate in case of false positives. |
+
+---
+
+# 7. Post-Incident Actions
+
+| Step | Purpose | Tool Example |
+|------|---------|-------------|
+| **Retrospective within 72 h** | Capture lessons before they fade. | Miro board, Markdown doc in repo |
+| **Update runbooks and detection rules** | Prevent repeat events. | Docs-as-code PR |
+| **Reward community reporters** | Encourage transparency. | Bug bounty payouts, incentive model |
+| **Public disclosure** | Build long-term trust. | Blog post plus on-chain message |
+
+---
+
+# 8. Quick-Start Templates
+
+| Need | Template location |
+|------|-------------------|
+| Incident channel message | /templates/incident-kickoff.md |
+| Retrospective form | /templates/retro-form.md |
+
+---
+
+# 9. Pros and Cons of Decentralized IR
+
+| Aspect | Pros | Cons |
+|--------|------|------|
+| **No single point of failure** | Resilience if one keyholder is offline. | Slower consensus for urgent actions. |
+| **Community trust** | Transparent logs and multisig votes. | Public scrutiny can amplify panic. |
+| **Open tools** | Low cost, auditable, extensible. | Less vendor support, more DIY. |
+| **Identity plurality** | Flexibility for global teams. | Complex to manage revocation and role drift. |
+
+---
+
+# 10. Keep It Alive
+
+- Run quarterly red team drills.  
+- Rotate secrets on a fixed cadence.  
+- Review identity proofs every six months.  
+- Measure mean time to detect and contain.  
+- Iterate on this framework during each retrospective.
+
+> **Remember**: Simplicity plus strong fundamentals beat heavy processes every time.

src/incident-management/templates/incident-kickoff.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+**Incident ID:**  
+**Date (UTC):**  
+**Initial Severity:**  
+**Current Status:** Open  
+
+## Summary  
+One-sentence description of the issue
+
+## Leads  
+- **Triage Lead:** @handle  
+- **Containment Lead:** @handle  
+- **Comms Lead:** @handle  
+- **Recorder:** @handle  
+
+## Key Links  
+- Timeline doc:  
+- Evidence bucket:  
+- Severity matrix entry:  
+
+## Immediate Actions  
+1.  
+2.  
+
+## Next Checkpoint  
+- **When:**  
+- **Where:**  
+
+> This thread is the single source of truth. Keep replies factual and action-oriented.

src/incident-management/templates/retro-form.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+**Incident ID:**  
+**Date Closed:**  
+**Severity:**  
+
+## 1. What Happened  
+Brief timeline highlights
+
+## 2. Root Cause  
+Single clear statement
+
+## 3. What Went Well  
+-  
+
+## 4. What Needs Improvement  
+-  
+
+## 5. Action Items  
+
+| Owner | Task | Due date | Status |
+|-------|------|----------|--------|
+
+## 6. Metrics  
+
+| Metric | Target | Actual |
+|--------|--------|--------|
+| Time to detect | | |
+| Time to contain | | |
+| Time to recover | | |
+
+## 7. Lessons Learned  
+Bullet summaries for the wiki
+
+## 8. Follow Up Verification  
+Date to review action item completion: