fix: also use jwks keys without "use" field#254
Merged
sevensolutions merged 1 commit intosevensolutions:mainfrom Feb 7, 2026
Merged
fix: also use jwks keys without "use" field#254sevensolutions merged 1 commit intosevensolutions:mainfrom
sevensolutions merged 1 commit intosevensolutions:mainfrom
Conversation
According to RFC 7517, the field "use" is optional:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7517#section-4.2 Requiring jkms responses to include it reduces compatibility with implementations which rightfully exclude it.
Owner
|
Thank you @bkw 👍 |
sevensolutions
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
According to RFC 7517, the field "use" is optional. Requiring jkms responses to include it reduces compatibility with implementations which rightfully exclude it.
In the spirit of being conservative in what you send and liberal in what you accept, I also submitted a PR for Rauthy, which is an excellent oidc provider that does not add this field. But I think we really should also accept keys without it, hence this PR.