Skip to content

build(deps): update dependency conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits to v9 (main) #118

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 13, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits (source) 7.0.2 -> 9.1.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

conventional-changelog/conventional-changelog (conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits)

v9.1.0

Compare Source

Features

v9.0.0

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
  • bang notes handling is removed, it already being handled in
    conventional-commits-parser
Features
  • bang notes handling is removed (#​1355) (5150f47)
  • scope, scopeOnly and bumpStrict options were added (e2973e2)

v8.0.0

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
  • Node >= 18 is required
  • conventional-recommended-bump: new Bumper exported class (#​1218)
  • cleanup presets interface (#​1215)
  • conventional-changelog-writer: rewrite to TypeScript (#​1150)
  • Now all packages, except gulp-conventional-changelog, are ESM-only.
Features
Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Author

renovate bot commented Jun 13, 2025

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: yarn.lock
➤ YN0000: · Yarn 4.9.2
➤ YN0000: ┌ Resolution step
➤ YN0085: │ + conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits@npm:9.1.0
➤ YN0000: └ Completed in 0s 501ms
➤ YN0000: ┌ Post-resolution validation
➤ YN0060: │ conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits is listed by your project with version 9.1.0 (pacd5b), which doesn't satisfy what @softwareventures/semantic-release-config requests (^4.6.3 || ^5.0.0 || ^6.0.0 || ^7.0.0).
➤ YN0086: │ Some peer dependencies are incorrectly met by your project; run yarn explain peer-requirements <hash> for details, where <hash> is the six-letter p-prefixed code.
➤ YN0086: │ Some peer dependencies are incorrectly met by dependencies; run yarn explain peer-requirements for details.
➤ YN0000: └ Completed
➤ YN0000: ┌ Fetch step
➤ YN0013: │ A package was added to the project (+ 20.19 KiB).
➤ YN0000: └ Completed
➤ YN0000: ┌ Link step
➤ YN0073: │ Skipped due to mode=update-lockfile
➤ YN0000: └ Completed
➤ YN0000: · Failed with errors in 0s 856ms

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/main-conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits-9.x branch from 806dc33 to 6ba48d7 Compare July 10, 2025 18:34
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/main-conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits-9.x branch from 6ba48d7 to 5b24b14 Compare August 10, 2025 15:44
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/main-conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits-9.x branch from 5b24b14 to 7fe64b4 Compare August 13, 2025 12:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants