Skip to content

Conversation

hanvyj
Copy link
Contributor

@hanvyj hanvyj commented Sep 25, 2020

Addresses issue
#9

@solzimer
Copy link
Owner

Hi @hanvyj , I'm reviewing the changes so I can merge the pull request.
Thanks for your contribution!

@hanvyj
Copy link
Contributor Author

hanvyj commented Sep 28, 2020

Hope it's okay. I tried to use similar escaping logic for fields as was in the header parsing.

I was using this as a source for changing the test data (looked like it was originally from a similar source):

https://kc.mcafee.com/resources/sites/MCAFEE/content/live/CORP_KNOWLEDGEBASE/78000/KB78712/en_US/CEF_White_Paper_20100722.pdf

Edit: Hmm, did a commit to publish a fork, wasn't expecting it to get pulled into the PR

Renamed peek shiftItem, and added an actual peak (which doesn't mutate the array).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants