output from spec generator #118
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
spec generator introduced here: https://github.com/stytchauth/protobuf/pull/564 |
ghost
commented
Feb 6, 2023
|
|
||
| @property | ||
| def sub_url(self) -> str: | ||
| return "o_auth_service" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks like there's an unsafe assumption about suburls that I'm generating noncompliant input for
added 8 commits
February 24, 2023 17:13
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this is what would happen if you generated the api spec using the spec generator introduced here
applied here using
with the assumption the
protobufandapiare sister directories containing those stytch repos