Add if_tun module #165
Open
Add if_tun module #165
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The btrfs diffs are likely due to using a different clang version. Iirc the current bindings use clang-22. |
|
I regenerated the bindings with clang 22, so the btrfs changes are reverted and the new module was already generated correctly. Would you prefer the new bindings to be in it's own module like it is now or to be included in another module like the net module ? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #163.
I simply added the
if_tunmodule and ran the generator with the command in the README, so I don't know why the btrfs module has been modified. Should I revert the btrfs changes ?