Confirm no extra backtick on README.md line 13 #27
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
4 tasks
Contributor
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Address feedback on validation setup refactor
Confirm no extra backtick on README.md line 13
Dec 2, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses false positive from automated code review claiming an extra backtick at the end of README.md line 13.
Verified the line is correct as-is:
No changes required - the backticks properly wrap each entity type with no trailing backtick.
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.