Conversation
|
@antekresic, @kpan2034: please review this pull request.
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9212 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.65% 85.78% +0.12%
==========================================
Files 245 245
Lines 47966 47935 -31
Branches 10709 10708 -1
==========================================
+ Hits 41085 41119 +34
- Misses 3524 3526 +2
+ Partials 3357 3290 -67 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Have to check that it won't break OSM: @gayyappan |
4d92ad7 to
52f6dfa
Compare
Thanks for the callout. This is not a problem for OSM. |
3b91f6d to
4a1853f
Compare
4a1853f to
df41eec
Compare
These are left over from when the procedure to convert continuous aggregate from partial format to new format were removed.
df41eec to
321dd35
Compare
fabriziomello
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I didn't removed this table to keep an execution history of the migration for customer. I think it should be removed in some releases in the future.
What is the useful content in this table that we need to keep it beyond 2.26? |
CAgg migration execution history. |
This is just the log and no longer relevant so i dont understand why we would need to keep it any longer cause any migrations happened months before the table gets removed. |
These are left over from when the procedure to convert continuous
aggregate from partial format to new format were removed.
Disable-check: force-changelog-file