Conversation
…om/blender/Rome into feature/issue-175-role-arn-support
Generated by 🚫 Danger |
e9a3d00 to
66ed491
Compare
|
@blender Thanks for this work, it will certainly save us a lot of time... would you be able to make a pre-release binary (or point me in the right direction) so I can test it and provide feedback? |
|
Hi,
I am not close to my computer at the moment. I will make a pre release on Monday.
If you feel adventurous you can try to compile yourself. Instructions are in the read me.
…Sent from my iPhone
On 31 May 2019, at 17:21, Oliver Atkinson ***@***.***> wrote:
@blender Thanks for this work, it will certainly save us a lot of time... would you be able to make a pre-release binary with this so I can test it and provide feedback?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
|
Thanks for the pointer @blender - I got the branch compiled, but it did not do what I expect. I assumed it would do the following:
I was not seeing the above behaviour, all files relating to the frameworks with valid version files were still being downloaded. However, there's a good chance I did not set it up correctly as I'm new to Rome. edit:
I have just seen your comment on the original issue, maybe this is what I am seeing - is it safe to add an option which does not download those files if the version file is present? |
|
Did you run it with —optimistic ?
…Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Jun 2019, at 14:04, Oliver Atkinson ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for the pointer @blender - I got the branch compiled, but it did not do what I expect. I assumed it would do the following:
Check the Cartfile.resolved against the .version file
If a match, no files relating to the framework would be requested (including bcsymbolmaps)
If there's a version mismatch, or lack of a version file then it would download all of the files relating to the framework.
I was not seeing the above behaviour, all files relating to the frameworks with valid version files were still being downloaded.
However, there's a good chance I did not set it up correctly as I'm new to Rome.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Yes |
|
This needs tests if anyone looking for hacktoberfest issues wants to finish it |
| <*> optimisticParser | ||
|
|
||
| uploadParser :: Opts.Parser RomeCommand | ||
| uploadParser = pure Upload <*> udcPayloadParser |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Found Use <$>
Why Not |
| reverseRomeMap | ||
| fVersion | ||
| platform | ||
| flip whenLeft eitherSymbolmapsOrErrors $ \e -> case e of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Found Use lambda-case
Why Not |
|
Any progress on this PR? |
|
@vytautasgimbutas it needs to be adapted to the current code base and it needs integration tests. Do you want to give it a shot? |
|
I'd be very interested in this too. |
|
When this is made available, can you also please include the "optimistic" parameter in the fasltane rome plugin? |
|
Contributions are accepted @felipe-azevedo |
As per #181 , if a version file exists trust that everything else is there too.