Draft
Conversation
maxteufel
reviewed
Jan 28, 2026
Co-authored-by: Max Teufel <max@teufelsnetz.com>
Member
Author
Currently not at all. I'm thinking maybe some channel/tunnel effect would be needed to share open resources among threads. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@tokiwa-software/developers looking for feedback on this.
Motivation: Currently there is no way to return a String backed by mapped_buffer without copying the buffer, (unless we are still inside the callback of the instated mmap-effect).
This PR adds a resource arena of some sorts that handles the closing of the open resources. This means file.open/use now returns a file, no callback anymore. This file can then be used whenever as long as inside of the resources arena.
The user still does not have to, and currently can not, manually close the file. It is manged by the resources effect. Also the user still does not need to handle
File_Descriptorin any way.