Skip to content

[Feat] Added option to specify priority class #557

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 22, 2025

Conversation

Fabhiahn
Copy link
Contributor

@Fabhiahn Fabhiahn commented Jul 1, 2025

I added an option to specify priorityClassName for each of the deployments.

Signed-off-by: Fabijan Marič Vild <[email protected]>
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Fabhiahn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new feature that enables users to specify a priorityClassName for deployments within the Helm chart. This allows for better control over pod scheduling and resource allocation based on priority. The changes involve modifying deployment templates, updating the schema, and adding documentation to the values file.

Highlights

  • Feature: Added the ability to specify priorityClassName for deployments, allowing users to define the priority of pods.
  • Deployment Configuration: Modified deployment templates for cache server, router, and vllm-multi to include an optional priorityClassName.
  • Schema Update: Updated the values.schema.json file to include priorityClassName as a valid option.
  • Values Configuration: Updated the values.yaml file to include documentation and a default value for priorityClassName in the router specification.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces the functionality to specify a priority class for deployments within the Helm chart. It modifies deployment templates for the cache server, router, and vllm-multi, and updates the values schema and default values to include the new priority class option. The review focuses on ensuring that the implementation is robust and handles cases where the priority class name is not provided.

Comment on lines +46 to +48
{{- if $modelSpec.priorityClassName }}
priorityClassName: {{ $modelSpec.priorityClassName | quote }}
{{- end }}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Consider adding a check to ensure $modelSpec.priorityClassName is not empty before quoting it. This prevents adding an empty priorityClassName field to the deployment if the value is not provided.[^1]

{{- if and $modelSpec.priorityClassName (not (empty $modelSpec.priorityClassName)) }}
      priorityClassName: {{ $modelSpec.priorityClassName | quote }}
      {{- end }}

Copy link
Contributor

@zerofishnoodles zerofishnoodles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@YuhanLiu11 YuhanLiu11 merged commit 5975c6d into vllm-project:main Jul 22, 2025
10 checks passed
ikaadil pushed a commit to ikaadil/production-stack that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2025
Signed-off-by: Fabijan Marič Vild <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yuhan Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ifta Khairul Alam Adil <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants