Skip to content

Conversation

Potabk
Copy link
Collaborator

@Potabk Potabk commented Jul 16, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it?

Cherry pick #1749 #1755 from v0.9.1-dev

Co-authored-by: zouyida [email protected]
Co-authored-by: zzzzwwjj [email protected]
Co-authored-by: wangli [email protected]

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

How was this patch tested?

@Potabk Potabk changed the title [Misc] Cherry pick #1749 from v0.9.1-dev [Misc] Cherry pick #1749 #1755 from v0.9.1-dev Jul 16, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 6.77966% with 55 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.59%. Comparing base (32a9c5f) to head (c5b8694).
⚠️ Report is 34 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
vllm_ascend/models/qwen2_5_vl_without_padding.py 6.89% 54 Missing ⚠️
vllm_ascend/quantization/quantizer.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1826      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.38%   73.59%   +2.20%     
==========================================
  Files         100      101       +1     
  Lines       10981    11454     +473     
==========================================
+ Hits         7839     8429     +590     
+ Misses       3142     3025     -117     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 73.59% <6.77%> (+2.20%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

dist.all_gather(list(chunk_hidden_states), e_hidden_states,
self.tp_group)
final_hidden_states = torch.cat(chunk_hidden_states, dim=0)
if fused_moe_state != FusedMoEState.AllGather:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did you drop the consideration of the AllGatherEP and NaiveMulticast states?

cc @ganyi1996ppo @zzzzwwjj

Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

Signed-off-by: wangli <[email protected]>
@Potabk Potabk closed this Jul 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants