[DOC] Qwen3 PD disaggregation user guide #2751
Merged
+296
−30
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <[email protected]>
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM Ascend project. The following points will speed up your PR merge:
If CI fails, you can run linting and testing checks locally according Contributing and Testing. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
documentation
wangxiyuan
reviewed
Sep 5, 2025
|
@Potabk please follow this guide to test locally and review it. Thanks. |
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <[email protected]>
|
@paulyu12 Have you once tried deploying all instances on the same node |
wangxiyuan
reviewed
Sep 5, 2025
Not yet. But if you need, I can try this scenario soon. |
paulyu12
changed the title
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <[email protected]>
Potabk
reviewed
Sep 5, 2025
Potabk
reviewed
Sep 5, 2025
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <[email protected]>
Potabk
reviewed
Sep 5, 2025
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <[email protected]>
Potabk
reviewed
Sep 5, 2025
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <[email protected]>
wangxiyuan
approved these changes
Sep 7, 2025
|
Thanks for the contribution |
Angazenn
pushed a commit
to Angazenn/vllm-ascend
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2025
### What this PR does / why we need it? The PR is for the document of the prefiller&decoder disaggregation deloyment guide. The scenario of the guide is: - Use 3 nodes totally and 2 NPUs on each node - Qwen3-30B-A3B - 1P2D - Expert Parallel The deployment can be used to verify PD Disggregation / Expert Parallel features with a slightly less resources. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? No. - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@e599e2c --------- Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <[email protected]>
offline893
pushed a commit
to offline893/vllm-ascend
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2025
### What this PR does / why we need it? The PR is for the document of the prefiller&decoder disaggregation deloyment guide. The scenario of the guide is: - Use 3 nodes totally and 2 NPUs on each node - Qwen3-30B-A3B - 1P2D - Expert Parallel The deployment can be used to verify PD Disggregation / Expert Parallel features with a slightly less resources. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? No. - vLLM version: v0.10.1.1 - vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@e599e2c --------- Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: offline0806 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it?
The PR is for the document of the prefiller&decoder disaggregation deloyment guide.
The scenario of the guide is:
The deployment can be used to verify PD Disggregation / Expert Parallel features with a slightly less resources.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
No.