Skip to content

[Feature] Add support for MoE models in the calibration-free RTN-based quantization #20766

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 26, 2025

Conversation

sakogan
Copy link
Contributor

@sakogan sakogan commented Jul 10, 2025

This PR enhances the work started in #18768.

It adds changes required to support MoE models (e.g., Llama4) quantized with RTN.
It also expands the relevant unit test to include an MoE model.

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @sakogan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the calibration-free RTN-based quantization framework by adding comprehensive support for Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models. It introduces dedicated methods and refines existing quantization logic to seamlessly integrate MoE layers, ensuring that these complex models can leverage the benefits of RTN quantization.

Highlights

  • MoE Model Support: Introduced a new RTNMoEMethod class to specifically handle the quantization and dequantization of weights within FusedMoE layers, enabling RTN quantization for Mixture-of-Experts architectures. The RTNConfig now correctly identifies and applies this method to MoE layers.
  • Quantization Logic Refinement: Updated the core rtn_quantize and rtn_dequantize functions to correctly process 3-dimensional tensors (e.g., [num_experts, hidden_size, intermediate_size]), which are common in MoE layers. This includes adjustments to group size calculations, clamping ranges, and the internal representation of quantized weights, transitioning to unsigned 8-bit integers (torch.uint8).
  • Weight Handling Improvements: Refactored the logic for converting RTNParameter instances to standard torch.nn.Parameter after loading into a new, reusable fix_weights helper function. This improves code maintainability and applies to both standard linear layers and new MoE layers.
  • Expanded Test Coverage: Added an MoE model (ai21labs/Jamba-tiny-dev) to the RTN quantization unit tests, ensuring that the new functionality for MoE models is properly validated.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This PR introduces RTN quantization support for MoE models. I've identified a critical issue in the fix_weights function related to tensor reshaping, and two high severity issues in rtn_quantize and rtn_dequantize related to clamping and centering of quantized values. Addressing these issues is crucial for the correctness and stability of the quantization implementation.

Comment on lines 411 to +412
data.copy_(tensor)
data -= q_range // 2
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The dequantization process subtracts q_range // 2 from the data data -= q_range // 2 only when num_bits == 8. This subtraction should also be applied when num_bits == 4 to correctly center the dequantized values around zero.

data.copy_(tensor)
        data -= q_range // 2

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@mgoin mgoin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting, these changes look reasonable to me. Nice work integrating and looking forward to future work.

@mgoin mgoin enabled auto-merge (squash) July 23, 2025 13:02
@mgoin mgoin added quantization ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed labels Jul 23, 2025
@vllm-bot vllm-bot merged commit 7ae75fa into vllm-project:main Jul 26, 2025
66 of 68 checks passed
liuyumoye pushed a commit to liuyumoye/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
HsChen-sys pushed a commit to HsChen-sys/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2025
wenscarl pushed a commit to wenscarl/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2025
x22x22 pushed a commit to x22x22/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2025
Pradyun92 pushed a commit to Pradyun92/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
npanpaliya pushed a commit to odh-on-pz/vllm-upstream that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
jinzhen-lin pushed a commit to jinzhen-lin/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2025
paulpak58 pushed a commit to paulpak58/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2025
taneem-ibrahim pushed a commit to taneem-ibrahim/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
BoyuanFeng pushed a commit to BoyuanFeng/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
diegocastanibm pushed a commit to diegocastanibm/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
quantization ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants