-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
[Feature] Add support for MoE models in the calibration-free RTN-based quantization #20766
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]>
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @sakogan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request significantly enhances the calibration-free RTN-based quantization framework by adding comprehensive support for Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models. It introduces dedicated methods and refines existing quantization logic to seamlessly integrate MoE layers, ensuring that these complex models can leverage the benefits of RTN quantization.
Highlights
- MoE Model Support: Introduced a new
RTNMoEMethod
class to specifically handle the quantization and dequantization of weights withinFusedMoE
layers, enabling RTN quantization for Mixture-of-Experts architectures. TheRTNConfig
now correctly identifies and applies this method to MoE layers. - Quantization Logic Refinement: Updated the core
rtn_quantize
andrtn_dequantize
functions to correctly process 3-dimensional tensors (e.g.,[num_experts, hidden_size, intermediate_size]
), which are common in MoE layers. This includes adjustments to group size calculations, clamping ranges, and the internal representation of quantized weights, transitioning to unsigned 8-bit integers (torch.uint8
). - Weight Handling Improvements: Refactored the logic for converting
RTNParameter
instances to standardtorch.nn.Parameter
after loading into a new, reusablefix_weights
helper function. This improves code maintainability and applies to both standard linear layers and new MoE layers. - Expanded Test Coverage: Added an MoE model (
ai21labs/Jamba-tiny-dev
) to the RTN quantization unit tests, ensuring that the new functionality for MoE models is properly validated.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This PR introduces RTN quantization support for MoE models. I've identified a critical issue in the fix_weights
function related to tensor reshaping, and two high severity issues in rtn_quantize
and rtn_dequantize
related to clamping and centering of quantized values. Addressing these issues is crucial for the correctness and stability of the quantization implementation.
data.copy_(tensor) | ||
data -= q_range // 2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's incorrect. The shift (subtraction) happens also when num_bits == 4
: https://github.com/sakogan/vllm/blob/78dcad8246f710c2ef9fe712f67894c02cb7d4d3/vllm/model_executor/layers/quantization/rtn.py#L418-L419
Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting, these changes look reasonable to me. Nice work integrating and looking forward to future work.
…d quantization (vllm-project#20766) Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]>
…d quantization (vllm-project#20766) Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]>
…d quantization (vllm-project#20766) Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: shuw <[email protected]>
…d quantization (vllm-project#20766) Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: x22x22 <[email protected]>
…d quantization (vllm-project#20766) Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]>
…d quantization (vllm-project#20766) Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]>
…d quantization (vllm-project#20766) Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jinzhen Lin <[email protected]>
…d quantization (vllm-project#20766) Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul Pak <[email protected]>
…d quantization (vllm-project#20766) Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]>
…d quantization (vllm-project#20766) Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Boyuan Feng <[email protected]>
…d quantization (vllm-project#20766) Signed-off-by: Alex Kogan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Diego-Castan <[email protected]>
This PR enhances the work started in #18768.
It adds changes required to support MoE models (e.g., Llama4) quantized with RTN.
It also expands the relevant unit test to include an MoE model.