-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10k
[Do not Merge] This pr might have triggered a CI bug #21929
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: wang.yuqi <[email protected]>
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to improve v1 engine support for several pooling models. The changes primarily involve removing workarounds and old decorators to align with the v1 architecture. Key changes include:
- Enabling v1 tests for models like
gte-Qwen2-1.5B-instruct
andgte-modernbert-base
by removing test skips. - Removing the
@support_torch_compile
decorator fromBertModel
andModernBertModel
, which is appropriate for the v1 compilation strategy. - A bug fix in
NomicBertModelConfig
to correctly calculaterotary_emb_dim
as an integer, preventing potential runtime errors.
I've identified a potential issue with the new guard logic in VllmConfig
that makes try_verify_and_update_config
a one-time execution method. This could prevent re-verification after manual configuration changes, potentially leading to misconfigurations. Please see my detailed comments on this.
Signed-off-by: wang.yuqi <[email protected]>
Try this PR What if there are still problems? QvQ There must have been a time when it ran successfully. https://buildkite.com/vllm/ci/builds/25235/steps/canvas?sid=01985436-2932-4921-9e74-ef09dd4f6772 |
Signed-off-by: wang.yuqi <[email protected]>
I suggest to rebase the PR after #21964 |
Signed-off-by: wang.yuqi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: wang.yuqi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: wang.yuqi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: wang.yuqi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: wang.yuqi <[email protected]>
#21964 has landed, unblock this pooling tests too |
Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist
supported_models.md
andexamples
for a new model.Purpose
#21270 Let v1 support encoder-only models, theoretically all pooling models should support v1.
Let's check which models are not supported.
fixed
address #21470 (comment)
Test Plan
Test Result
(Optional) Documentation Update