Merged
Conversation
alessandromazza98
approved these changes
Mar 7, 2026
alessandromazza98
left a comment
alessandromazza98
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. I left a comment on the actual utilityZ - i.e. where do we use this feature?
Still approving though because it's definitely not breaking the previous api
| self.storage.propagate_up(index); | ||
| self.recompute_root(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| let num_zeros = leaf - num_leaves; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this useful in practice? It may sound confusing to use set_leaf for a non initialized leaf
|
Oh, CI is not passing, you can take a look at it before merging it |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Makes set_leaf more flexible
Adds method to get empty value