Skip to content

Conversation

@bfops
Copy link
Collaborator

@bfops bfops commented Oct 30, 2025

Description of Changes

For some reason, the Internal Tests have trouble fetching the commit sha, especially when the job is re-run. This PR switches it to using ref names rather than commit sha, because the ref names are much more durable than GitHub's ephemeral commits that it generates during workflows.

API and ABI breaking changes

None. CI only.

Expected complexity level and risk

1

Testing

  • CI still passes
  • Ref still gets checked out successfully on re-run.

@bfops bfops added release-any To be landed in any release window no runtime change This change does not affect the final binaries labels Oct 30, 2025
@bfops bfops requested a review from jdetter October 30, 2025 18:58
@bfops bfops marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2025 18:35
Copy link
Contributor

@cloutiertyler cloutiertyler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had no idea you could write JS in a github script, TIL.

@bfops bfops added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 7, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Nov 7, 2025
@bfops bfops added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 7, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Nov 7, 2025
@bfops bfops added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 09bca44 Nov 7, 2025
26 of 27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

no runtime change This change does not affect the final binaries release-any To be landed in any release window

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants