Skip to content

Conversation

@davidlehn
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@aljones15 aljones15 force-pushed the vc-2.0-time-props branch 2 times, most recently from f8099c3 to dbaf8c8 Compare December 8, 2023 17:53
@davidlehn davidlehn changed the base branch from vc-2.0-time-props to update-vc-2.0 May 17, 2024 20:39
@davidlehn davidlehn force-pushed the example-usage-script branch from a8f3e25 to 67e109e Compare May 17, 2024 20:40
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.86%. Comparing base (9975a7b) to head (e31d82a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #162   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.86%   90.86%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines        1106     1106           
=======================================
  Hits         1005     1005           
  Misses        101      101           

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9975a7b...e31d82a. Read the comment docs.

@davidlehn davidlehn force-pushed the example-usage-script branch from 67e109e to 9cd3290 Compare August 12, 2024 19:03
@davidlehn davidlehn changed the base branch from update-vc-2.0 to main August 12, 2024 19:03
@davidlehn davidlehn marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2024 19:03
@davidlehn davidlehn requested a review from dlongley August 12, 2024 19:03
@davidlehn
Copy link
Member Author

@dlongley said elsewhere "we should have @digitalbazaar/ed25519-multikey installed there as an option for use as well"

@BigBlueHat
Copy link
Contributor

@dlongley said elsewhere "we should have @digitalbazaar/ed25519-multikey installed there as an option for use as well"

@davidlehn can we add that at a later date? Does it need to block this from being merged?

@dlongley dlongley force-pushed the example-usage-script branch from 7778ce6 to 2673e51 Compare January 24, 2025 16:09
davidlehn and others added 13 commits January 24, 2025 11:09
- Use verify suite.
- Add multikey resolver.
Co-authored-by: Dave Longley <[email protected]>
- Adding VP support to futher expand the example.
- Using did:key for VC and did:web for VP to add variety.
- Print out logging as we go.
- Print readable first stack trace if there are verify errors.
- Add static DID Document to loader.
- Fix typos.
- Use P-256 for VC and P-384 for VP for variety.
- Add P-384 support to did:web driver.
- Use 'authentication' method from VP did:web document.
- Add optional domain for example.
- Formatting.
@dlongley dlongley force-pushed the example-usage-script branch from 2673e51 to e31d82a Compare January 24, 2025 16:10
@dlongley dlongley merged commit b8a9f5c into main Jan 24, 2025
5 checks passed
@dlongley dlongley deleted the example-usage-script branch February 1, 2025 23:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants