Skip to content

Conversation

sendaoYan
Copy link
Member

@sendaoYan sendaoYan commented Jul 24, 2025

Hi all,

I think the test java/net/ipv6tests/TcpTest.java should report jtreg.SkippedException when there no IPV4 addresses or no IPV6 addresses, rather than just print a messge and then report test run passes.

Change has been verified locally, both enable ipv6 and disable ipv6 on linux. When enable ipv6, test run passes; when disable ipv6, test report jtreg.SkippedException as expected. Test-fix only, no risk.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8362855: Test java/net/ipv6tests/TcpTest.java should report SkippedException when there no ia4addr or ia6addr (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26459/head:pull/26459
$ git checkout pull/26459

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26459
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26459/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26459

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26459

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26459.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 24, 2025

👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 24, 2025

@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8362855: Test java/net/ipv6tests/TcpTest.java should report SkippedException when there no ia4addr  or ia6addr

Reviewed-by: jpai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8362855: Test java/net/ipv6tests/TcpTest.java should report SkippedException when there no ia4addr or ia6addr 8362855: Test java/net/ipv6tests/TcpTest.java should report SkippedException when there no ia4addr or ia6addr Jul 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 24, 2025

@sendaoYan The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • net

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Webrevs

@@ -62,12 +65,10 @@ public class TcpTest extends Tests {
public static void main (String[] args) throws Exception {
checkDebug(args);
if (ia4addr == null) {
System.out.println ("No IPV4 addresses: exiting test");
return;
throw new SkippedException("No IPV4 addresses: exiting test");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @sendaoYan, isn't an import jtreg.SkippedException; required for this change?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change require import jtreg.SkippedException, it's already import at line 42.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right - i missed that in my review.

Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks OK to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 25, 2025
@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

@jaikiran Thanks for the reviews.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 27, 2025

Going to push as commit 8fcbb11.
Since your change was applied there have been 16 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 27, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 27, 2025

@sendaoYan Pushed as commit 8fcbb11.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@sendaoYan sendaoYan deleted the jbs8362855 branch July 27, 2025 01:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated net [email protected]
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants