Skip to content

Fervo_Project_Cape-4 Stimulation Costs Update #97

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

softwareengineerprogrammer
Copy link
Owner

@softwareengineerprogrammer softwareengineerprogrammer commented Aug 5, 2025

Adjust Fervo_Project_Cape-4 stimulation cost to $4M per well. Remove 15% inflation during construction hedge since we'll consider the unexpectedly-higher stimulation costs to have eaten it. (Inflation during construction is now $58.2M as dicated by 1-year construction time + 2.3% inflation rate)

…% inflation during construction hedge since we'll consider the unexpectedly-higher stimulation costs to have eaten it. (Inflation during construction is now $58.2M as dicated by 1-year construction time + 2.3% inflation rate)
@softwareengineerprogrammer softwareengineerprogrammer added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 5, 2025
Comment on lines +32 to +33
Reservoir Stimulation Capital Cost per Injection Well, 3.48, -- Estimated cost of $4M per well including 15% contingency.
Reservoir Stimulation Capital Cost per Production Well, 3.48, -- Estimated cost of $4M per well including 15% contingency.
Copy link
Owner Author

@softwareengineerprogrammer softwareengineerprogrammer Aug 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO: Should be "Estimated cost of $4M/well once 15% contingency is applied"

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ in source code for the full set of inputs.
| Fraction of Investment in Bonds (percent debt vs. equity) | 60% | Approximate remaining percentage of CAPEX with $1 billion sponsor equity per Matson, 2024. Note that this source says that Fervo ultimately wants to target "15% sponsor equity, 15% bridge loan, and 70% construction to term loans", but this case study does not attempt to model that capital structure. |
| Exploration Capital Cost | $30M | Estimate significantly higher exploration costs than default correlation in consideration of potential risks associated with second/third/fourth-of-a-kind EGS projects |
| Investment Tax Credit Rate (ITC) | 30% | Same as 400 MWe case study (Fervo_Project_Cape-3) |
| Inflation Rate During Construction | 15% | Conservatively models the equivalent of a higher annual inflation rate (4.769%) over a 3-year period as a hedge against construction delays and short-term inflation volatility. |
| Construction Years | 1 | Calibrated to a 2-6 year construction time for a 1 GW plant (Yusifov & Enriquez, 2025) |
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FIXME re: line 50 above - needs to be updated!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant