Skip to content

Conversation

fingolfin
Copy link
Member

@fingolfin fingolfin commented May 21, 2025

We can't expect general rings to support inv, not even for the ring's one element. These tests may be reactivated in a future version, e.g. if we add an implements trait.

Alternative to @HechtiDerLachs's PR #2077. May fix this "properly" in PR #1957 or a follow-up, but for now this is the obvious change to make.

@HechtiDerLachs of course you might run in further issues, let me know if that's the case.

We can't expect general rings to support inv, not even for the
ring's one element. These tests may be reactivated in a future
version, e.g. if we add an `implements` trait.
@fingolfin fingolfin added the release notes: not needed PRs introducing changes that are wholly irrelevant to the release notes label May 21, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.36%. Comparing base (7be7ddb) to head (be0c4ef).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2096      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.36%   88.36%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         126      126              
  Lines       31627    31624       -3     
==========================================
- Hits        27948    27944       -4     
- Misses       3679     3680       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@fingolfin fingolfin closed this May 23, 2025
@fingolfin fingolfin reopened this May 23, 2025
@fingolfin fingolfin requested a review from lgoettgens May 23, 2025 13:16
@lgoettgens lgoettgens enabled auto-merge (squash) May 23, 2025 13:18
@HechtiDerLachs
Copy link
Contributor

Alternative to @HechtiDerLachs's PR #2077

That PR contains not only changes to the docu, but another actual bugfix. Maybe we should split that one off, then.

@lgoettgens
Copy link
Member

Alternative to @HechtiDerLachs's PR #2077

That PR contains not only changes to the docu, but another actual bugfix. Maybe we should split that one off, then.

#2077 was just updated to only the bugfix and no longer change any documentation. aka we want to merge both #2077 (in its current form) and this PR here.

@lgoettgens lgoettgens merged commit 3b8a7d4 into master May 23, 2025
58 of 60 checks passed
@lgoettgens lgoettgens deleted the mh/AbstractAlgebra.inv-test branch May 23, 2025 16:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release notes: not needed PRs introducing changes that are wholly irrelevant to the release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants