Remove EcalEndcapPInsert

[akioogawa]

Briefly, what does this PR introduce?

Remove EcalEndcapPInsert since it will not be built.
See : eic/epic#855 for removing it from geometry.

I'm not sure if I should remove it from :

EICrecon/src/services/io/podio/JEventProcessorPODIO.cc

Line 255 in c9ea43d

"EcalEndcapPInsertRawHits",

EICrecon/.github/janadot.groups

Line 7 in c9ea43d

-PJANADOT:GROUP:EcalEndcapPInsert=edm4hep::SimCalorimeterHit:EcalEndcapPInsertHits,edm4hep::RawCalorimeterHit:EcalEndcapPInsertRawHits,edm4eic::CalorimeterHit:EcalEndcapPInsertRecHits,edm4eic::ProtoCluster:EcalEndcapPInsertIslandProtoClusters,edm4eic::Cluster:EcalEndcapPInsertClusters,edm4eic::MCRecoClusterParticleAssociation:EcalEndcapPInsertClusterAssociations,edm4eic::ProtoCluster:EcalEndcapPInsertTruthProtoClusters,edm4eic::Cluster:EcalEndcapPInsertTruthClusters,edm4eic::MCRecoClusterParticleAssociation:EcalEndcapPInsertTruthClusterAssociations,color_blue

How can I remove it from auto checks?

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bug fix (issue #__)
• New feature (issue #__)
• Documentation update
• Other: __

Please check if this PR fulfills the following:

• Tests for the changes have been added
• Documentation has been added / updated
• Changes have been communicated to collaborators

Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code?

No more EcalEndcapPInsert

Does this PR change default behavior?

No more EcalEndcapPInsert

[github-actions]

Capybara summary for PR 1852

• rec_dis_10x100_minQ2=0_craterlake_10x100
• rec_dis_10x100_minQ2=1000_craterlake_tracking_only
• rec_dis_18x275_minQ2=0_craterlake_18x275
• rec_dis_18x275_minQ2=0_craterlake_18x275_MT
• rec_dis_18x275_minQ2=1000_craterlake_18x275
• rec_dis_18x275_minQ2=1000_craterlake_18x275_MT
• rec_dis_5x41_minQ2=0_craterlake_5x41
• rec_e_1GeV_20GeV_craterlake
• rec_pi_1GeV_20GeV_craterlake
  ^{_{Last updated 2025-06-17T20:50-04:00 3c89ed2}}

[veprbl]

I'm not sure if I should remove it from :

EICrecon/src/services/io/podio/JEventProcessorPODIO.cc

Line 255 in c9ea43d

"EcalEndcapPInsertRawHits",

EICrecon/.github/janadot.groups

Line 7 in c9ea43d

-PJANADOT:GROUP:EcalEndcapPInsert=edm4hep::SimCalorimeterHit:EcalEndcapPInsertHits,edm4hep::RawCalorimeterHit:EcalEndcapPInsertRawHits,edm4eic::CalorimeterHit:EcalEndcapPInsertRecHits,edm4eic::ProtoCluster:EcalEndcapPInsertIslandProtoClusters,edm4eic::Cluster:EcalEndcapPInsertClusters,edm4eic::MCRecoClusterParticleAssociation:EcalEndcapPInsertClusterAssociations,edm4eic::ProtoCluster:EcalEndcapPInsertTruthProtoClusters,edm4eic::Cluster:EcalEndcapPInsertTruthClusters,edm4eic::MCRecoClusterParticleAssociation:EcalEndcapPInsertTruthClusterAssociations,color_blue

Yes, please remove those and other instances too.

How can I remove it from auto checks?

There are codes in
https://github.com/eic/detector_benchmarks/
that rely on EcalEndcapPInsertRecHits and EcalEndcapPInsertClusters, so we need to fix those codes before this can be merged. cc @sebouh137

[sebouh137]

I'm not sure if I should remove it from :

EICrecon/src/services/io/podio/JEventProcessorPODIO.cc

Line 255 in c9ea43d

"EcalEndcapPInsertRawHits",

EICrecon/.github/janadot.groups

Line 7 in c9ea43d

-PJANADOT:GROUP:EcalEndcapPInsert=edm4hep::SimCalorimeterHit:EcalEndcapPInsertHits,edm4hep::RawCalorimeterHit:EcalEndcapPInsertRawHits,edm4eic::CalorimeterHit:EcalEndcapPInsertRecHits,edm4eic::ProtoCluster:EcalEndcapPInsertIslandProtoClusters,edm4eic::Cluster:EcalEndcapPInsertClusters,edm4eic::MCRecoClusterParticleAssociation:EcalEndcapPInsertClusterAssociations,edm4eic::ProtoCluster:EcalEndcapPInsertTruthProtoClusters,edm4eic::Cluster:EcalEndcapPInsertTruthClusters,edm4eic::MCRecoClusterParticleAssociation:EcalEndcapPInsertTruthClusterAssociations,color_blue

Yes, please remove those and other instances too.

How can I remove it from auto checks?

There are codes in https://github.com/eic/detector_benchmarks/ that rely on EcalEndcapPInsertRecHits and EcalEndcapPInsertClusters, so we need to fix those codes before this can be merged. cc @sebouh137

I have created a pull request for this just now; see eic/detector_benchmarks#151

[veprbl]

Everything looks good in the diff

[veprbl]

(Let's wait to see if there more comments and merge Tomorrow, otherwise.)