Skip to content

Conversation

@dnaeon
Copy link
Contributor

@dnaeon dnaeon commented Sep 25, 2025

Description

This PR is a continuation of PR #13844 , which had to be reverted in #13899, because of an issue with the apidiff tool as described in #13897 .

On top of the changes initially proposed in #13844, this PR also adds the gomodTidy option to renovate postUpdateOptions, so that module dependencies are properly updated before new changes are proposed by renovate.

The changes from this PR have been applied to my fork, so that I can confirm that all workflows are passing as expected and a couple of dummy PRs can be seen below.

cc: @mx-psi , @dmathieu , @codeboten

P.S.: Sorry for the troubles caused by the initial PR!

Link to tracking issue

Fixes #13897

Testing

Local testing as well as testing with PRs against my fork (see links in the description for sample PRs and workflow runs)

Documentation

N/A

@dnaeon dnaeon requested a review from a team as a code owner September 25, 2025 15:32
@dnaeon dnaeon requested a review from songy23 September 25, 2025 15:32
@dnaeon dnaeon mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2025
@dmathieu dmathieu added the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label Sep 25, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.65%. Comparing base (2e5abce) to head (ae3f125).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13906      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.67%   91.65%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         652      652              
  Lines       42516    42516              
==========================================
- Hits        38978    38970       -8     
- Misses       2730     2736       +6     
- Partials      808      810       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@codeboten codeboten left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

happy to try this again now that the release is done. thanks @dnaeon

@codeboten
Copy link
Contributor

please resolve the conflict and we can get this merged

@dnaeon dnaeon force-pushed the feat/tools-directive-v2 branch from 994a175 to f9141fa Compare October 8, 2025 07:50
@dnaeon dnaeon force-pushed the feat/tools-directive-v2 branch from 3b91a70 to ae3f125 Compare October 8, 2025 08:25
@dmathieu
Copy link
Member

dmathieu commented Oct 8, 2025

Please avoid force pushing, even your own branches. It breaks the GitHub review interface.

@dnaeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

dnaeon commented Oct 8, 2025

Please avoid force pushing, even your own branches. It breaks the GitHub review interface.

I'll keep that in mind, thanks.

@dnaeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

dnaeon commented Oct 8, 2025

please resolve the conflict and we can get this merged

@codeboten , done.

@codeboten codeboten added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into open-telemetry:main with commit 650a809 Oct 8, 2025
61 of 62 checks passed
@otelbot
Copy link
Contributor

otelbot bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Thank you for your contribution @dnaeon! 🎉 We would like to hear from you about your experience contributing to OpenTelemetry by taking a few minutes to fill out this survey.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the next release milestone Oct 8, 2025
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2025
#### Description

Update the check-codeowners workflow to use the `make
generate-codeowners` target rather than invoking the githubgen tool
directly.

#### Link to tracking issue

Fixes the check-codeowners workflow to align with
#13906

#### Testing

N/A

#### Documentation

N/A
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

missing tools

3 participants