Skip to content

Conversation

@jonas-
Copy link
Contributor

@jonas- jonas- commented Feb 9, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@OTL OTL left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I apologize for the delay. Considering the current context, it might be better to separate ROS 2 and ROS into distinct sections. I'd like to keep ROS (1) as it's still in use.


*[ROS](http://www.ros.org/) related libraries.*

*ROS(1) & ROS2:*
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for super late.
I think it's better to write like

Suggested change
*ROS(1) & ROS2:*
*ROS(1) & ROS2 client:*

* [ros2-client](https://github.com/Atostek/ros2-client) - Rust native client library for ROS2
* [rclrust](https://github.com/rclrust/rclrust) - Yet another ROS2 Rust client (Archived)

*Various*
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
*Various*
*ROS 2 related libraries*

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants