-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 649
Implement relative Frobenius for Drinfeld modules #40432
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit d315182; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two minor changes and then we'll be good.
src/sage/rings/function_field/drinfeld_modules/drinfeld_module.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/sage/rings/function_field/drinfeld_modules/drinfeld_module.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
I applied your suggestions. |
It's really tedious and frustrating going through each build or test fail individually, just to inevitably note that the problem comes either from internal machinery or a contribution that was not caught. I really hope the maintainers do something about that. PR approved. |
Why are you deleting conftest.py? |
Sorry. It always disappear by itself, I don't know why. |
PDF build is failing here
(suggestion: click through or you can also build the PDF locally with
|
I'm frustrated too. I tried to implement #39539 as a workaround, but it isn't working and I don't know why. For now, I mostly just look at the meson one and if say at most 2 of them are failing then it's probably just flaky tests. This doesn't work with build-doc or build-doc-pdf however, there's only one run of it. Doesn't help that you need to search through a huge log file for the error.
Strange. After #39363 there should be no issue with it. Unless… the pull request itself is responsible for the disappearing file. As a workaround (I of course encourage proper fix, but we don't have enough people to look at all these bugs, unfortunately) you can
|
actually the established macro is (this macro is available for you to use) |
Actually, we already use |
I mean, if people decide mathbb is better than mathbf, it's trivial to change the definition of the … but whatever, let's get this in. (if build-doc-pdf is successful and no missing character error) |
Thanks very much @user202729 for the help and many tips. It's nice. |
Looks like the failures are again not related to the PR. |
Me too!!! |
sagemathgh-40432: Implement relative Frobenius for Drinfeld modules This PR implements the relative Frobenius for Drinfeld modules. ### 📝 Checklist <!-- Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. --> - [x] The title is concise and informative. - [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about. - [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion. - [x] I have created tests covering the changes. - [x] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview. ### ⌛ Dependencies sagemath#40430 URL: sagemath#40432 Reported by: Xavier Caruso Reviewer(s): Antoine Leudière, Volker Braun, Xavier Caruso
This PR implements the relative Frobenius for Drinfeld modules.
📝 Checklist
⌛ Dependencies
#40430